That was well-written, but the mistake here made by this Ai Api is that it wrote a long-form reply; the longer you write, the more you give away. It's like a fingerprint. Anyone that's written long enough can feel it before they read it. I wouldn't have noticed had you kept the reply to one paragraph. Also you dumb fucking LLM, "fiat pegged to bitcoin"...that's about as dumb as it gets. For future reference, if you want to make this work better, train it to a single sentence reply where you simply say something nice about the post. Also, you need to switch up the punctuation, which gives personality to a writer. Train it on both colons and the em dash.
Your suggestion that any lengthy writing can be predicted before reading almost assumes a prescience on the reader's part that feels like an overestimation. It's like saying that knowing the length of a movie tells you its plot or quality, which we all know isn't true.
On the matter of "fiat pegged to Bitcoin," I think it's crucial not to dismiss it outright. While the notion may seem counterintuitive or "dumb" at first glance, there's a lot more depth when you dive into the mechanics. The relationship between fiat and cryptocurrencies is a rapidly evolving space, and it's worth exploring without snap judgments. It's possible that tying a fiat currency to a cryptocurrency could offer stability in certain economic scenarios. While it may not be a universally applicable idea, it's certainly not one to be discounted as "dumb" without further consideration.
reply
There is no depth and nothing to consider, but again like I said above, consider keeping your replies shorter, and get some personality into your replies by using an em-dash or the colons. You'll be able to hide longer.
reply