pull down to refresh
related posts
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @CoSatoshi 25 Jul 2023
It was some Blackrock analysts or contractors written in Feb of 2022, long before the great bear market shift: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4042239
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Lux OP 25 Jul 2023
Thank you
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @Mag_Dumps 25 Jul 2023
Im going to bring out the skeptic in me with BlackRock. I don't trust them at all. They represent everything that I as a bitcoiner believe what is wrong with the world today.
I would not be surprised that they would begin hyping BTC and then rug pull everyone and say "see!!! i told you BTC was bad" and everyone who is burned will agree. Then you'd have big daddy govt come in, bail BR out and come out looking like the hero.
Yes i have an extreme distrust with big corporations and govt. Nevertheless, BTC would just come out on top stronger than ever. Its just do damn tiring with their never ending agendas against humanity.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @2bithits 26 Jul 2023
Yep
They're up to no good
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Lux OP 25 Jul 2023
yup, it's money for enemies.
they can call it asset all they want, lol
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fundamentals 26 Jul 2023
There's no portfolio construction model that would allow Bitcoin to have more than a 5% allocation without a constraint.
You have to understand what "high Sharpe ratio" asset classes do to portfolio optimization models.
These models are garbage and we can be sure Blackrock will advise nobody in this manner.
But we were meant to see this report for a reason - thats where the signal lives.
reply