Title says it all, just curious to see if anyone still uses Muun wallet?
I still use it as hot onchain wallet . Is really good to refill my Phoenix channel
reply
i've heard of many people still using it
reply
Downloaded it, but don't use it. WoS and Strike are much easier, better UI/UX, work perfectly. I never hold more than maybe $50 in there (which is my 'max willing to lose')
reply
Ugh "A custodial account works the way I'm experienced with, therefore it has good UX"
reply
In other words, it's intuitive and easy to use. Ideal for newcomers (which I'm not).
Get over it. Custody wallets are going to have a role in the transition period. Stop being a dogmatic tightwad purist.
reply
Its not dogmatic holy fuck.
Custodial failure points: rehypothecation theft censorship
There are real failure points of custodians I can point to with large macroeconomic effects at scale. Familiarity is not the standard for user experience.
reply
Lolz "it's not dogmatic see here's a bunch of dogma" 🤡
reply
What the flying...are we using the same language right now?
dogma noun dog·​ma ˈdȯg-mə ˈdäg- pluraldogmas also dogmata ˈdȯg-mə-tə ˈdäg- Synonyms of dogma 1 a : something held as an established opinion especially : a definite authoritative tenet b : a code of such tenets pedagogical dogma c : a point of view or tenet put forth as authoritative without adequate grounds 2 : a doctrine or body of doctrines concerning faith or morals formally stated and authoritatively proclaimed by a church
In other words "Here is something you must believe because I as an authority tell you to believe it without question"
Stop me now if you don't agree with that definition.
So I then gave provable pain points of custodians. That you see those pain points as being "dogmatic" says to me that you see rehypothecation (which basically allows the custodian to create money) as an acceptable thing (even though it follows with failure such as we saw with FTX and Celsius)
It says to me that you see theft by a custodian as something to be acceptable
It says to me that censorship by a custodian is something to be acceptable (and this one I can see people agreeing with. There are people who believe this should be a thing and you can put yourself in that situation all you like, but I'm not putting myself there)
The rehypothecation failure point is way bigger than that though because it doesn't just affect your and your money, it affects everyone.
reply
I'll take 1c. for 10,000 sats, Alex.
reply
So you're basically saying the verifiable reasons I pointed to for why we should avoid custodians are not adequate grounds for you.
It's the only one on my phone, but it's also currently empty. Does that count?
reply
I have a muun wallet with 1500 sats still left in it. Does that count?
reply