pull down to refresh

CuckCuckGo

reply

deleted by author

There seems to be this push even among privacy services to "comply." I understand removing shortcuts for "illegal" services but I don't see how they're liable for not blacklisting something. They index the web. It's not their job to police it.

reply

deleted by author

This is so disappointing

reply

Right? I thought the DuckDuckGo guys were spiritually on our side? Or at least on the side of open, neutral and fair web.

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author

I fucking hate that DDG went this way. At least now we know what their principles are.

reply

deleted by author

Wow can you take an opportunity to grab more market share from Google and piss it all away, ive been using brave and qwant of late

reply

have you noticed any issues with qwant?

reply

Terms of Service Didn't Read is a good place to start for questions like this.

https://tosdr.org/en/service/527

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author

Shame.
Unfortunately, Impervious isn't an option either as it's funded by a bunch of cucks. It's 2022 and the Internet has no decent effin browser...gnaahhh.

reply

Well, there's Tor.

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author

Everything they builded for years destroyed, gone in weeks.

reply

deleted by author

We're literally going to have to decentralize everything.

reply

presearch are trying

reply

warning: shitcoin

reply

Indeed. I would love to see a lightning powered version of Presearch.

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author

this is what happens when the business model is advertising

reply

deleted by author

RIP duckduckgo.

Look at the aggregator project Searx:

https://searx.space/

Some of the instances are pretty interesting (they provide different interfaces).

Also maybe https://www.alexandria.org

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author