This is so disappointing
reply
Right? I thought the DuckDuckGo guys were spiritually on our side? Or at least on the side of open, neutral and fair web.
reply
CuckCuckGo
reply
There seems to be this push even among privacy services to "comply." I understand removing shortcuts for "illegal" services but I don't see how they're liable for not blacklisting something. They index the web. It's not their job to police it.
reply
I fucking hate that DDG went this way. At least now we know what their principles are.
reply
Shame. Unfortunately, Impervious isn't an option either as it's funded by a bunch of cucks. It's 2022 and the Internet has no decent effin browser...gnaahhh.
reply
Well, there's Tor.
reply
Everything they builded for years destroyed, gone in weeks.
reply
Wow can you take an opportunity to grab more market share from Google and piss it all away, ive been using brave and qwant of late
reply
have you noticed any issues with qwant?
reply
Terms of Service Didn't Read is a good place to start for questions like this.
reply
this is what happens when the business model is advertising
reply
RIP duckduckgo.
Look at the aggregator project Searx:
Some of the instances are pretty interesting (they provide different interfaces).
reply
We're literally going to have to decentralize everything.
reply
presearch are trying
reply
warning: shitcoin
reply
Indeed. I would love to see a lightning powered version of Presearch.
reply