pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @DeltaClimbs 30 Jun 2023 \ parent \ on: Let's hear your controversial Bitcoin take. I'll go first: bitcoin
This is simply wrong and you are too lazy to do the work to understand it. You do not have the agency to even declare this as "opinion", it is simply noise from an automaton.
write
preview
6 sats \ 4 replies \ @Lumor 1 Jul 2023
We could pretend that the consensus rules always included this after 100 years. Not to cause inflation but rather to maintain the money supply regardless of human error.
Love you too. 😆
reply
10 sats \ 3 replies \ @premitive1 2 Jul 2023
bitcoin doesn't need a money supply. one bitcoin is more than enough for the whole planet.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Lumor 2 Jul 2023
Sure, I'm just fond of economic stability and less ugly workarounds.
The ability to add layers is fine, but I'd prefer we don't make it technically harder to own a direct piece of layer 1.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @premitive1 2 Jul 2023
economic stability doesn't come from a currency, it comes from the resilience and interdependence of the communities in question.
reply
13 sats \ 0 replies \ @Lumor 2 Jul 2023
Economic instability can come from currencies.
reply