pull down to refresh
230 sats \ 23 replies \ @designsats 30 Jun 2023 \ on: Let's hear your controversial Bitcoin take. I'll go first: bitcoin
There wont ever be "hyperbitcoinisation". You can only hyperbitcoinize yourself. If you have bank account and preach about hyper..., you are hypocrite
bitcoiners still want cars and airplanes and swimming pools and places to sleep. in the status quo those things take bank accounts, especially if you want to build any of those things.
reply
Retarded. This is just lack of understanding basic economics to imagine the dollar will be around forever 😂🤣🤡
Is this the best ya got for controversial?
reply
Certainly it wont happen in our lifetime.
Do you have bank account ser?
reply
Timeline is total speculation, not an absolute. I do not even rule out 1000 years of fiat even if I assign it a practically infinitesimal probability.
reply
A company can make their own token and mandate them inside their ecosystem. Making a fiat.
I will make such just to make sure you wont be correct as you live. There will be some fiat all your life. Deal with it or cry harder
reply
You are a contrived son of a central banker 🤡
reply
Anything to see you cry :) I need to hydrate *slurp
reply
Why would I cry? I am obviously right. You can go ahead and cry when your precious fiat is all gone in a decade or two.
reply
your bloodline is weak
Cos I ordered you to :D
You my little bitch
Now please cry some more.
Imagine a 1 week blackout after natural disaster or war.
Do you expect there will be something like trusted bitcoin-backed notes?
If not, I listen to your proposition. How would commerce continue in such case?
reply
When you are looking for weird edge cases with a tiny scope, you can simply accept defeat with honor, rather than feigning ignorance as to the legal notion of spirit of the law.
But yes, bitcoin bearer instruments would be what you want in that situation, along with physical supplies. You have to be really dumb to think dollars will hold value so you can trade them after a natural disaster. Be better. Be a bitcoiner. Live like a bitcoiner.
reply
I didnt mention dollars so you must be talking about someone else.
Considering onchain isnt for day-to-day. It couldt be something like opendime. So there will have to be trust involved.
What defeat? This isnt debate to win. Im curious whats your solution for something that happens quite frequently in many parts of the world. I had 8h blackout today. So it got me curious how would bitcoin fix that
reply
All right, maybe misinterpreted based on barrage of other comments, but check this out.
I forget whether it's on chain or not, but idk why you can't do something similar to Offline Cash with Lightning, or perhaps a not fully trustless Chaumian mint.
https://twitter.com/offlinecashco
reply
Whats problematic is - you never know in advance when big backout happens. So having amount of trusted or semitrusted notes just in case doesnt seem like viable option.
Gonna ask guys who develop custodial wallets what they think.
ok fiatist with bank account :D
reply
Where did I say dollar will be around forever? Fiat will be around, not dollar.
Its pretty controversial when I get people putting words in my mouth to object :)
reply
USD 2.0, whatever you want to call it, doesn't make a difference, equally moronic
reply
Glad we agree fiat wont go away.
reply
Nope, all fiats will die and you're a moron if you don't get why
reply
In previous message you said USD 2.0 will be around. Why are you talking that way about yourself?
reply