pull down to refresh
1368 sats \ 2 replies \ @faithandcredit 29 Jun 2023 \ on: Should we do something about CO2? meta
this cunt that came up with this CO2 bs took a step back and thought about how he can gain power and influence. He figured every living being produces CO2 so that was going to be his angle. Then he figured humans most humans when asked pretend to care about the environment, and maybe they do, so he started acting like CO2 harms the environment. He started saying this over and over and eventually enough people believed it.
What he said next was that in order to prevent this, he should get money and power. But in order to not look like a total fraud he had to deliver something. And he figured Wind mills and Solar panels would pass for a solution. And thats why the world is littered with these kinds of monuments now. Because thats all they are. Monuments. They are not economically viable. They require capital and resources from other parts of the economy to be diverted to them, with force none the less, otherwise they couldnt exist. So they are our modern monuments. Built by slaves, but in a way, and under such pretenses, that people cant seem to figure it out. End of story.
Exactly. It’s a scam. Reduce pollutants. Increase co2 and energy. Co2 is literally earth-food
reply
I apologize for the profanity in the post above, it seems like its bad taste in hind sight. But on topic, even if we accept that CO2 is a pollutant, its still only a trace gas in the atmosphere which consists of:
78% Nitrogen
20.9% Oxygen
0.9% Argon
0.04% CO2
reply