320 sats \ 8 replies \ @0000 29 Jun 2023 \ parent \ on: Should we do something about CO2? meta
You are being dishonest with your knowledge.
The claim that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant because it is essential for plant growth is a common argument made by some individuals. However, it oversimplifies the complex nature of CO2 and its effects on the environment. While it is true that plants use CO2 during photosynthesis and that it is necessary for their growth, the issue arises when there is an excessive buildup of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Here are a few points to consider:
Climate Change: Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, meaning it traps heat in the Earth's atmosphere. The increasing levels of CO2 resulting from human activities, such as burning fossil fuels, are a major contributor to climate change. The excessive amounts of CO2 contribute to the greenhouse effect, leading to global warming, rising sea levels, and disruptions in weather patterns. These changes have significant negative consequences for ecosystems, biodiversity, and human societies.
Ocean Acidification: Excess CO2 in the atmosphere is absorbed by the oceans, causing them to become more acidic. This process is known as ocean acidification. Acidic waters can harm various marine organisms, including shell-forming organisms like coral reefs, oysters, and plankton. This disruption can have far-reaching ecological consequences, impacting entire marine food chains and ecosystems.
Health Impacts: High levels of CO2 can have adverse health effects on humans. When CO2 concentrations are elevated indoors, such as in poorly ventilated spaces, it can lead to symptoms like headaches, dizziness, shortness of breath, and impaired cognitive function. While these levels are typically not reached in outdoor environments, the overall impact on climate change and related health consequences are of concern.
It is important to note that the claim about getting rid of all CO2 without negative consequences is misleading. While reducing CO2 emissions is necessary to mitigate climate change, abrupt elimination of all CO2 emissions would have significant economic and social repercussions. Transitioning to cleaner energy sources and reducing greenhouse gas emissions is a complex global challenge that requires careful planning and consideration.
While CO2 is essential for plant growth, the excessive buildup of CO2 in the atmosphere contributes to climate change, ocean acidification, and adverse health impacts. These consequences highlight the importance of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate these effects while also considering the broader implications of abrupt changes in CO2 levels.
Ok chatgpt
reply
Yeah like I said. Didn't feel like arguing. Why do that when LLM can crank out the words I would have spent 20 minutes typing anyways? Not worth my time to put actual effort into this but we can keep going. Just know you are responding to AI.
reply
You are using LLM to argue like a bitch. No amount of your crying is going to stop the increase of co2 in the air (which is earth-food)
All you are going to accomplish is pain and suffering in the global south.
Stop shilling for genocide you trash
reply
deleted by author
reply
Nice. Didn’t get what u want from trashgpt?
Just know you are losing and nothing you can do will change it.
reply
Don't insult his religion, that's not cool either lol
reply
Why do people breathe into a paper bag when they’re having a panic attack? If CO2 is a deadly pollutant / poisonous to humans in high concentrations, wouldn’t that cause a person to panic even more? I’m not smart enough to understand all the complexities, so I’m all ears.
reply
Water could be considered a pollutant if your home was flooded with it. If the Atmosphere was flooded with CO2 maybe that would have serious consequences for life on earth. Does that sound scary?
The levels of CO2 in the atmosphere is 0.04%. Its basically a trace gas. And plants, grass, algae, consume it. The CO2 that humans release already existed. Stored underground in the form of natural gas and oil, among other things. When we use it we are releasing the carbon back into the atmosphere. And it will be consumed by plants and what not again. And these plants among other things will eventually become oil again, its a cycle and therefore you can argue Earth is naturally carbon neutral.
reply