0 sats \ 2 replies \ @anon1 29 Jun 2023 \ parent \ on: How do we make BTC the reserve currency when users are so inept? bitcoin
Non-custodial lightning wallets work okay right now but in order for bitcoin to succeed, onchain fees will have to increase by quite a bit. If fees were to reach equivalent value today of 50 USD it will make the practicality of using a non-custodial lightning wallet pretty low for the average person.
I think the average person will use custodial lightning for their day to day transactions but keep their saving in self-custody layer 1 wallets.
write
preview
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @nerd2ninja 29 Jun 2023
You have recency bias anon. I'll remind you that only 6 years ago we didn't have lightning at all and the size for every transaction was much larger. If we were posting back then, we would arguing over how Bitcoin can succeed at on-chain is the only option they have.
https://thebitcoinmanual.com/articles/open-multiple-lightning-channels/
The idea of transaction batching, even using a lightning wallet just last year was crazy to a lot of people on SN. Fees are so cheap! Why bother with such a thing! So to then suggest transaction batching, bah, humbug. Now look, Eclair, which the lightning implementation Pheonix uses, has a splicing prototype!
https://www.nobsbitcoin.com/eclair-v0-9-0/
And look at this neat improvement proposal: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2023-March/003886.html
Things are happening! Just keep your ear to the ground and don't expect how things are now to be how they will always be.
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon1 29 Jun 2023
Very true! Things will change and I hope that non-custodial lightning does become much more onchain footprint minimized.
Also other layer 2 solutions like ARK are being explored.
reply