A pop up with lightning invoice for zaping post from outside ( non sn users) is good
352 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b 26 Jun 2023
We have gh issue for it ... https://github.com/stackernews/stacker.news/issues/266
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Wumbo 26 Jun 2023
I am just thinking of unintended consequence. Would there need to be a minimum amount set to prevent people "spamming" SN lightning node with 1 sat payment?
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @AR0w OP 26 Jun 2023
10+ or 100+ sat zap limit will be good
reply
201 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 26 Jun 2023
We could create minimums
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 30 Jun 2023
I don't understand what the issue is with "spamming" the SN node with 1 sat payments from a technical perspective.
Is it about creating a lot of 1 sat invoices (and never paying them - but then I guess the amount doesn't matter) or about actually paying a lot of 1 sat invoices?
But in both cases I would still be confused.
What is the problem with this "spam"?
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Wumbo 30 Jun 2023
Good point @ekzyis, the size payment probably doesn't matter. You are correct I was refereeing to the number of invoice that might be generated. Now one at least have to have an account to generator an invoice or a LN Node. vs in the future just a web browser. Maybe a time cool down based on IP address would be a easy check.
As always this is hypothetical and may never been a real issue.
reply
455 sats \ 0 replies \ @bshell 26 Jun 2023
This is a great idea.
reply
13 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 26 Jun 2023
Indeed, every SN page is a possible funnel for sats into the ecosystem and the more funds flinging around the more people pay attention because people like money
reply