I'm just wondering if there are any plans on these suggestions:
#188714
pull down to refresh
1087 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 20 Jun 2023
I like nearly all of those ideas and want to begin experimenting with them.
The biggest problem we continue to have is prioritizing stuff because until we have more programmers, every feature competes with every other.
My SN priorities atm:
- logged in stackers' feeds are private property
- ranking specific to you, mutes, and maybe follows
- required for (2)
- user generated subs where rather than having mods we have economic planners
- pay to create subs
- get paid by people posting in them like SN does ... stackers can run subs as a business ... maybe
- optional non-custodial wallet integration
There are also some other ideas we are discussing like advertising treasure hunts for getting stackers more sats.
@ekzyis makes his own priorities mostly and is working on "liveness" - realtime updates for notifications, comment threads, item stats etc.
I'll be looking to hire another programmer soon. I just need to sit down and write up the job post and prepare to for The Great Application Sift.
reply
251 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 20 Jun 2023
Thanks for all this information.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @OneOneSeven 20 Jun 2023
Like coding treasure hunts (bounties?) or the Nicholas Cage kind of treasure hunt?
I like making puzzles with sat rewards but would rather make ones that can reach the most ppl possible.
reply
132 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 20 Jun 2023
Like Nic Cage. @kr wrote up a gh issue describing it: https://github.com/stackernews/stacker.news/issues/313
reply