290 sats \ 15 replies \ @ek 11 Jun 2023 \ on: Choice in favor of Muun bitcoin
it's not a lightning wallet though
Yes, but it works great with Lightning. At least he gets any amount of sat. Haven't tried sending yet.
reply
Dude, like, half the functionality of a wallet is sending funds.
If you haven't tried sending, you've barely tried the wallet at all.
reply
Already tried. Everything works: both several sats and larger transactions. But given the comments on this thread, I won't be using this cryptocurrency wallet.
reply
Sending can break down in high onchain fee environments bc of how many submarine swaps Muun does
reply
It cannot be used for many things that lightning is used, like login for example.
reply
Then which one?
reply
I use Phoenix
reply
How about WoS?
reply
WoS is custodial so not comparable to Muun or Phoenix imo
WoS also doesn't support LNURL-auth like Muun (you can't login with Lightning on SN) even though they said they want to at some point.
reply
In this case, Satoshi Wallet is better
reply
Why? In which case?
reply
He is also a custodial. Easy to use, convenient, understandable
reply
What do you mean with "also"? Muun and Phoenix are not custodial.
You can go with custodial, sure. But it's not a long term storage solution. You mentioned here that this is what you are going for.
Heard but not used
reply