0 sats \ 1 reply \ @P2P_bitcoin 6 Apr 2022 \ on: Reputation based trust model vs privacy · Issue #39 · Reckless-Satoshi/robosats bitcoin
1/ Dispute solvers will ask for evidence. All evidence can potentially be faked. But the cost of faking evidence (specially if a video or videoconference) is so high that it makes the whole thing unviable. I call it "Evidence as proof of work".
2/ In RoboSats (very small quantities and relevant skin-in-the-game in forms of bonds), this approach is very robust and easy to implement. In Bisq and other platforms with larger amounts... might still be worth the work to fake evidence...
3/ At the core, the best dispute resolution system is the one that disincentives cheating effectively. If you know some math and the term 'opportunity cost', you won't even try to cheat in RoboSats.
write
preview
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @P2P_bitcoin 6 Apr 2022
So on RoboSats you may be asked to go on video and show your evidence?
Potentially, yet you will never be asked to disclose yourself. You will be given a short time to record a full run of your device: turn on, unlock, navigate, show evidence, from an external cam and a clock at sight. Easy to do if you are legit, too hard to fake for a small pay.
reply