172 sats \ 4 replies \ @jk_14 21 May 2023 \ parent \ on: Centralizing Forces - A Weekend Discussion bitcoin
Because you like the truth straight in the face:
Your logic is just the multidimensional shit.
I) Ghash.io passed 51%, "but GHASH was a good pool", LOL
in other words: centralization is bad, but when done by a good pool, it looks better, lol
(btw, slushpool was good too in 2014)
II) "This will increase the challenge on the fee market and that is good"
NO, it's not a good thing. Period.
You're wandering around like a child in a fog.
Because with each consecutive halving, we inevitably approach the post-subsidy era.
So, let you keep promoting harder yet your dumb as fuck logic: "all those greedy miners forced slowly to accept low fee txs" - and some day you'll wake up with your hand in the potty:
i.e. no block subsidy & and Bitcoiners well used to "right" of low fees (I smell a socialism here ;)
If you want cheap fees, migrate to LN when on-chain fees are low - end of story.
"Yes, hate me if you want, for my writing tone.
I don't fucking care! It's your problem not mine, if you are too snowflake for my way."
:))
I already use LN more than you can imagine.
You really think that you can troll me. You are mistaken. I don't give a shit.
reply
"Nothing induces a bigger annoyance than the Truth"
not sure if the truth may troll someone... maybe :)
reply
You are far far away from truth.
reply
Ok, I understand:
your quotes are not your quotes.
Naive & funny :)
reply