One has a tract record of shipping code that manages hundreds of millions of dollars, collaborating with protocol developers, and focusing on providing application devs the support they need for over half a decade.
All these protocols are layer 2 solutions and Bitcoin blockchain is just a storage layer for them, so I guess that all of them (and maybe something else) will be present in some proportion.
The question I'd ask is how many stablecoins do we need, why is it more than 1 and if it's 1, then why do we need whole framework, protocol and node impl for this?
One has a tract record of shipping code that manages hundreds of millions of dollars, collaborating with protocol developers, and focusing on providing application devs the support they need for over half a decade.
My bet is on them.
and Bisq are working on RGB integration yesterday! https://twitter.com/bisq_network/status/1658381775863685121 This is the news!
Open source and decentralisation obviously win. RGB can't be sued!
Sadly looks like inscriptions will win by a large margin
Sad but true - most simple and understandable solutions win
I'm out here rooting for taro
Well, it is a root!
I prefer Taro
Yes good post 👍
https://m.stacker.news/18839
All these protocols are layer 2 solutions and Bitcoin blockchain is just a storage layer for them, so I guess that all of them (and maybe something else) will be present in some proportion.
The question I'd ask is how many stablecoins do we need, why is it more than 1 and if it's 1, then why do we need whole framework, protocol and node impl for this?
I thought RGB was more generalized than Taro (btw I don't think they're named this anymore)
Both.
In the end of day market will decide what's "better" protocol.
going to wait for this to blow over
Both!
deleted by author
There is RGB documentation out there:
https://rgb.tech/
https://www.rgbfaq.com/
https://blackpaper.rgb.tech/
deleted by author
Merkle sum sparse merkle trees lol
Merkle sum sparse merkle trees lol
Merkle sum sparse merkle trees lol