Quite frankly, it doesn't matter who's next. I think it's much better to have adoption from the ground up instead of top down; I believe bottom up is the only approach that is sustainable anyways. Central planning in complex systems usually don't end well because of the inability for the central planner to see unintended consequences.

If there is enough people who demand bitcoin in a jurisdiction, it will become tender no matter if it is legal or not. On the other hand, if there is not enough bitcoin demand in a jurisdiction, no amount of legal tender law can force people to use bitcoin as tender. Legal tender laws of a undesired currency will simply push people into an underground economy that uses an alternate desired currency.

Because we see the quality and superiority of bitcoin, a lot of us tend to get impatient when it comes to adoption. We want others to see the light, to go down the rabbit hole, to feel the better experience that holding and using bitcoin provides. However, we must keep in mind that adoption of a new money is a very long process and could take decades to happen. Money adoption takes long because true adoption happens from bottom up.

Orange pilling is the way. If we want that Neo and Morpheus meme to come true; if we want to one day not have to sell our bitcoin into fiat to spend it on things we want/need; start by orange pilling your family, friends, neighbours, rancher, butcher, plumber, electrician, hair stylist, etc etc etc.

Just my 2 sats. Keep working and keep it real.