Here's invite for 546 sats. Use it as you like.

https://stacker.news/invites/clgm4c479000090olog4k9as2

None of the benefits of Bitcoin is compromised here and now since this is purely added value which increases bitcoins value proposition on top of all onchain Features anybody could have for a fair market price. 

Nobody should have a wallet just for 546 sats. Why would you even own bitcoin worth less than a dollar, realistically?

I'm not against simpler solutions. I'm against solutions that compromise basically all benefits of bitcoin.

joko

Are you agree to hold somewhere in custody 546 sats which is the 

Do you think that holding 546 sats should be facilitated on exclusively non-custodial way?

Self custody may be hard and expensive. Especially if one departs from just holding keys to running and using full nodes. In Metamask people store funds in self-custody. Does it worth anything though if it could connect to specific web sites only?

bitcoin

Custodial Lightning is Great 

notgeld

Why are you against simpler solutions?

> Holding Bitcoin yourself

Are you agree to hold somewhere in custody 546 sats which is the [dust limit](https://trezor.io/learn/a/dust-dust-limit)?

Do you think that holding 546 sats should be facilitated on exclusively non-custodial way?

> Self custody isn't that hard 

Self custody may be hard and expensive. Especially if one departs from just holding keys to running and using full nodes. In Metamask people store funds in self-custody. Does it worth anything though if it could connect to specific web sites only?