28 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 26 Mar 2022 \ parent \ on: Daily discussion thread
Yeah, I noticed it too. Two trusted users appear to have colluded.
Introducing a downvote that costs 10 sats or more, more expensive than an upvote, would deter tyranny but still allow the masses to check abuses.
Eventually too, your WoT will be different than mine and a downvote will do little more than effect what you see and what people who trust you see.
Eventually too, your WoT will be different than mine
Interesting. So kind of like how Twitter tries to show me what it thinks I want to see?
I suppose, I could always use an un-authenticated session to see what normies see then.
reply