related posts
220 sats \ 1 reply \ @foundationdvcs 28 Mar 2023
We'll be covering this research in-depth on today's Journey to Sovereignty Space at 2PM EDT!
Don't miss out, we're incredibly excited to talk such an important and timely topic with @0xB10C:
https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1ZkKzXdwAkaJv?s=20
reply
31 sats \ 0 replies \ @foundationdvcs 29 Mar 2023
The episode is now live on your favorite podcast apps, including Fountain:
https://journeytosovereignty.alitu.com/episode/6d4b78cb-de83-4819-934a-d077ad836762
Welcome any feedback you all have, and hopefully this is a good companion resource to the incredible research of @0xB10C!
reply
23 sats \ 4 replies \ @DarthCoin 28 Mar 2023
What do you think about this? @TonyGiorgio and @theindranetworkprotocol
reply
391 sats \ 2 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 28 Mar 2023
I thought it was pretty well known that this is not only possible but probable. Great research and write up though.
Another reason your bitcoin node should be tor only.
reply
1535 sats \ 1 reply \ @kristapsk 28 Mar 2023
Tor only has potential eclipse attack issues (see old paper Bitcoin over Tor isn't a good idea), for preserving privacy Tor + I2P is better way to go. Having two different privacy networks mitigates this. If possible, adding Blockstream sattelite receiver on top will also help.
reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 28 Mar 2023
Also adding the banlist option in bitcoin core and remove the fuckers.
I keep also a limited number of allowed peers on my bitcoin.conf.
reply
384 sats \ 0 replies \ @l0k18 28 Mar 2023
I think a money transmitting network needs to have anonymity. Transactions should never appear near the physical store of the private key.
reply
13 sats \ 1 reply \ @franzap 29 Mar 2023
Too bad https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19042 is not yet implemented.
A (tedious) alternative is manually pasting the signed tx hex in any of the online explorers such as:
- https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/pushtx/
- https://blockstream.info/tx/push
- https://btc.network/broadcast
Obviously use VPN and/or their Tor services
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @tomlaies 29 Mar 2023
I think "tor only" is a little problematic - but I could see "try tor first and have clearnet as fallback"
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @quemadera 28 Mar 2023
I think that bitcoin besides being traceable should be anonymous, if transactions are associated to ip it would be the opposite.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BBitcoinUSA 29 Mar 2023
This sounds fairly concerning
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @selfish_gene 29 Mar 2023
значит путать транзакции прямо в блоке. сможете?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @billiam 29 Mar 2023
Running VPN on Host and a VM with NAT network running a node behind tor. Gives good protection against ISP ip leaks which would reveal you identity.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jinformatique 28 Mar 2023
What do you guys think about NYM to protect the privacy and anonymity of the data over the network?
Nym protects even against the most powerful, passive adversaries that can observe every packet going in and out of your internet connection. With Nym, you can use the internet without fear of being watched.
https://nymtech.net/about/
I'm just following the Telegram channel but had no time to try it now.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @monmicrolancer 29 Mar 2023 freebie
Very intéressant