pull down to refresh

So the tl:dr is:So the tl:dr is:

Either risk your pot with Saylor and co. to recieve a juicy divvy but inherit custody risks
(Include ETFs as a risk with no divvy)

Or hold your own BSR and utilise it by earning sats by operating a public Ln node

Hmmm sounds good but the report downplays channel rebalancing, forced closures and constant maintenance for a 4% return?

Or more positively, hodl your stack without risk of custody, learn Ln infrastructure and earn 4% while you're at it

Or be lazy give it to Saylor/Fink and let them deal with the hassle


I think Zeus are onto something here, protecting your stack while monetising it, and most importantly educating more entities into running real true and pure Lightning (not ark,spark,shart) will grow and evolve Lightning but it comes at a cost, and that is there is no such thing as a free lunch, you gotta put in what you get out

learn Ln infrastructure and earn 4% while you're at it

I think that's the way to think about it for most people

reply

Companies can do this at scale. Hobby node runners don’t have capital or the technical expertise to get this level of return.

reply

Correct, and if the big players implement lightning correctly it can lead to a widespread adoption of the correct use of Bitcoin

Where things go wrong is when dark forces try to co-opt it by promoting their scams

reply