I think he is being chicken little about the quantum risk because he is a VC in a crypto quantum company so I am not dismissing his incentives here but I don't think he is completely wrong about the potential ramifications if an actual quantum attack did occur.

Maybe I am pessimistic but the newer wave of Bitcoin investors (the ones that have bought up all the coins OGs have sold) don't seem to understand Bitcoin at all and they don't seem interested in learning either. It is just another asset for them. I suppose it was inevitable that later adopters were never going to be as ideologically connected to the project as early adopters but I feel like this makes Bitcoin more vulnerable that it was during other times of crisis. Again maybe I am too pessimistic. It's been a disappointing couple of years. Feels like grassroots adoption is dying and wall st adoption is growing. I expected the rest of the world to keep grassroots adoption alive while the US went through its wall st coin phase. Hasn't really happened and that leaves me thinking other than the most hardened and passionate Bitcoiners where is the demand when everyone else in the world is selling?