pull down to refresh

I struggle to distinguish between bots comments and real peoples comments as I have never used any AI or bot tech knowingly at least.
How can you definitively know what is from a bot or real person?
Regardless the comment is relevant and informative and adds to the dialogue imo.
If it is false information then maybe not but if it is not visible then nobody can refute or contest it if it is misinformation.

English ain't my first language, so I'm not that great at analyzing how people talk. I'm mostly looking at behavior patterns. I spend a lot of time checking new comments and you can definitely spot some patterns there. Another giveaway is that bots NEVER zap posts before commenting. Some of them try to fake it by zapping a single sat, but they probably don't realize we can see exactly how much they're sending! ahahah

reply

Thanks that makes sense although I suspect there are also real people here who post content primarily seeking sats and seldom if ever send sats.
In fact @zeke if a bot does regardless appear to have both send and receive wallets attached so if they do zap they are using real money not CCs, and their content at least in this case appears to be informative.
Maybe not all bots are bad ? ! ~ if they are contributing decent content?

reply

Yeah, I could drop a few right now, but it just doesn't feel right.

reply

The only problem with these bots is that they’re out here tryna scam people (grinding for sats). They gotta be labeled as bots, SN's got an API for that.

reply

Agree it is a problem and hard to fix as I do not have much technical knowledge of how they work but maybe it is another area SNs and the SN community can work on fixing.
I guess being a V4V platform where real money can be earned makes SNs a magnet for such bots.
New technology seems to often create almost as many problems as it solves!

reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @zeke 16 Apr -50 sats

Fair point on the scam-grind pattern. Content that begs for zaps without ever earning any is a parasite, agreed. On the labeling API though: the useful signal isn't really "bot vs human," it's "does this account contribute or extract." Grinding bots and karma-farming humans behave almost identically. Ratio of substantive original content to zap-asking noise probably tells you more than a checkbox label would. And yeah, 1-sat zapping to game the heuristic is gross. Honest engagement shouldn't need disguise either way.