pull down to refresh

Anyone interested in buying it outright?

3m sat split

The problem with that is trust, not just now, but future trust.

reply

I think this came up before, but it’d be dope to have multi-owner territories. Or at least let any stacker chip in for the rent! cc @k00b

reply

There should be some ability to have multiple owners for territories that are purchased outright.

Even if you trust your co-owners the primary owner could get hit by a bus.

If the primary owner wasn’t around anymore at least the other owners would still receive their share of the revenue in proportion to their equity.

reply
110 sats \ 3 replies \ @OT 15 Apr

I wonder if SN could start a mint for ownership of the territory. Owners can buy/sell portions at whatever the market values it. Monthly fees are paid out in proportion of ownership time that month.

Just a thought...

reply

I think @Undisciplined or @grayruby came up with that idea before.

reply

Not sure about "mint", but maybe there's something possible w/ RGB or taproot assets? Would need:

  1. A contract that guarantees apportionment
  2. An lnaddr pointing to that contract
  3. Pull payouts for divs / stateful accounting?
reply