pull down to refresh

deleted by author

Again, it is just another fork of Core with some different/extra knobs and some additional/different ideological baggage. What's the point? There is already a Core fork with more knobs and a religionist maintainer, why in the absolute fuck would we need or want another one‽

reply

There are a bunch of fresh contributors coming in to Bitcoin Core that have nothing to do with chaincode. Chaincode also hasn't run a residency in a few years. Their recent programs have been fully remote and I know a few people with families who have done it. The majority of contributors don't live in those listed cities and don't work out of these offices.

I am confused by the goals you would like to achieve. You say that you don't want drama and be apolitical, but you also want to take principled positions, such as rejecting bip110. That seems in conflict to each other, and I don't really feel that is different to what Bitcoin Core is trying to achieve.

By what mechanism will donors be able to express themselves?

reply
We want to be the implementation that rejects 100KB OP_RETURNs and BIP110 which lack consensus. Both of those are filled with drama. We want none of that.

that's very welcome, thank you. That infighting was a complete dead end

reply

For those that would rather watch something: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_cTPCkZi00

reply