pull down to refresh

๐ŸŸข Teams hold three key meetings in April to review 2026 car rules and propose fixes โ€” TAC on April 9 & 16, then principals meeting April 20.

โšก Main focus: how engine electrical energy is deployed and recharged (qualifying recharge limits, super-clipping behaviour).

๐Ÿ”‹ FIA already cut qualifying max recharge from 9 MJ to 8 MJ at Suzuka to reduce super clipping.

๐Ÿ Qualifying issues: drivers often must lift-and-coast to manage energy, making some fastest laps slower through corners.

๐Ÿšฆ Super clipping: automated top-speed drops trigger at high-speed points to recharge the battery; contributes to inconsistent closing speeds between cars.

โš ๏ธ Safety concern: large closing-speed differentials highlighted by Ollie Bearmanโ€™s high-speed crash avoiding a slower car not deploying energy.

๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Potential in-season fixes will be software-only (engine management); hardware changes must wait until 2027 due to homologation rules.

๐Ÿ”„ Possible tweaks under discussion: adjust recharge caps, modify super-clipping caps (kW), expand or change Straight Mode/active aero use in qualifying.

๐Ÿ“Š Review rationale: organizers waited to gather data from 3 races (practices, sprint, quals, grands prix) across varied tracks before proposing changes.

๐Ÿค Political challenge: solutions must balance safety, spectacle, and teamsโ€™ competitive interests; votes expected at April 20 principals meeting.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7180393/2026/04/08/f1-new-cars-rule-changes-meetings

@grayruby what i was talking about, wait the final meeting to adjust your team

reply

You think this will negatively affect Mercedes?

reply

If it's only for qualify I don't think so, but once you give team principles a place to debate it's impossible guarantee it will stop there.

I'll wait and see

reply

I changed out my whole team after the last race. Let's see if it pays off in Miami. If not, back to the drawing board.

reply