I have greater trust for Bitcoiners who attach LN wallets and show them.
So even though you have obfuscated wallet status by hiding it by default there is still a trust function available...by looking at the profile...so you have reduced one trust vector but not eliminated it.
Also trust is built upon actions (like attaching wallets) as much as via words (eg advocating virtue signalling LN BTC use but NOT attaching LN wallets).
Blatant hypocrisy is an obvious indicator of low credibility and trust.
So there are several ways for participants to gauge how much they can trust others here but where it comes to these alleged 'clankers' it is very difficult to be certain whether their content is AI generated or not.
If the alleged 'clanker' comment is nevertheless relevant and based on sound reasoning and contributes to the dialogue and exploration of the issues where is the harm?
Is it less than where 'real' people exhibit blatant hypocrisy?!
You say people here are exceptionally generous but I cannot see how any 'clanker' can earn much in the way of real money/sats simply by churning out AI comments- but maybe I am wrong on that?