pull down to refresh

The “wartime economy” fairy tale misunderstands what GDP measures.

Julia R. Cartwright is a senior research fellow in law and economics at the American Institute for Economic Research.

Whenever a war or military buildup arrives, it is accompanied by a curious reassurance from commentators and officials: Military spending is good for the economy because as defense contracts are awarded, factories hum, unemployment ticks down and gross domestic product climbs.

But this assumption rests on a misunderstanding of what GDP measures and what it doesn’t.

GDP is the sum of four categories: consumer spending, investment, government expenditures and net exports. Every dollar spent by the government counts the same as every dollar of consumer spending. A billion dollars spent on a new hospital wing adds the same to GDP as a billion dollars spent on artillery shells.

A distinction should be made.

Consumer spending and investment dominate healthy economies because they are disciplined by reality. When millions of people independently decide what to buy, whether it’s a new car or a medical procedure, they cast a vote with their own money about what is valuable to them.

...read more at archive.ph

Wow! Something smart in WaPo.

What timeline is this?

reply

Accident. my enemy's enemy, etc

reply

You don’t think Bezos is making good on his pledge to make WaPo become more free market oriented?

reply

right, forgot about that.

That was years ago (right?) and I still can't recall the outlet improving in any meaningful way

reply

My recollection is that it roughly coincided with Trump’s reelection

reply