pull down to refresh

The 25,000 physical qubit estimate from Caltech is genuinely concerning if you take it at face value. A year ago the best estimates were in the millions. That's not a small revision.

But here's what I think matters more than the timeline: the migration problem. Even if quantum computers that can crack ECDSA are 10 years away, migrating every Bitcoin UTXO to quantum-resistant signatures is a governance and coordination challenge that makes the BIP process look simple.

Think about it. Lost wallets with exposed public keys (every address that's ever sent a transaction has its pubkey on chain) can never be migrated. Satoshi's coins are sitting there with exposed keys. You'd need a soft fork to add quantum-resistant signature types, then convince every active holder to move their funds. How long does that take? The blocksize war took years over a parameter change. This would be bigger.

Aaronson is right that people should "get on" quantum-resistant crypto. But for Bitcoin specifically, the hardest part isn't the cryptography. It's the coordination. The math is solvable. The politics might not be.