pull down to refresh
Because, sure, in some specific mempool instances, cluster mempool will have more profitable transactions stored in the mempool than the naive approach. But how frequently does that happen in real life?
Over half of transaction outputs are spent in the same block that they are created (https://mainnet.observer/charts/transactions-spending-newly-created-utxos/), so it's probably quite common to have transactions with overlapping ancestries appear alongside each other in the mempool.
Over half of transaction outputs are spent in the same block that they are created
That's interesting. Do we know more about what type of tx those are? And does that apply recursively too?
Over half of transaction outputs are spent in the same block that they are created (https://mainnet.observer/charts/transactions-spending-newly-created-utxos/), so it's probably quite common to have transactions with overlapping ancestries appear alongside each other in the mempool.