pull down to refresh
the problem isn't who is doing the moderation (human or algo or AI).
it's is the moderation any good. and do you have any say in how it works.
Sounds like:
The problem isn't who controls speech.
it's is the control doing what you like.
I don't believe it can be done better than what we've seen. That's why I'm here. Perhaps money can work better at moderation.
I don't expect, however, that courts will note the distinction.
it's not even the control doing what you like. It's you being in control.
Or at least having the option of trying to be in control.
Protocols with clients that reapect the user agent metaphor give you that option. Bitcoin is one such protocol, email is another, and nostr is one as well.
SN is not. I love stacker news but it is what it is: a centralized commercial platform, just like tik tok and facebook.
Last time I looked nostr content discoverability and basic usability was a shit show. That's why I use stacker news more and nostr not much.
I could imagine a future where stacker news is an opinionated nostr client that respects the user agent metaphor but also gives good usability like we currently have.
It's all fantast for now. Chances of s230 repeal anytime soon is nil. But I like to have an optimistic vision and that's mine.
optimistic visions are good.
I'm curious what you think of this scenario:
SN runs a relay like primal. All accounts on SN are just key-pairs. Would such a setup be better than the current one where SN does not run a relay nor automatically publish all items as nostr events (although, stackers can currently enable cross-posting to nostr)?
but you also hate getting 8000 dick pics in your feed.
the problem isn't who is doing the moderation (human or algo or AI).
it's is the moderation any good. and do you have any say in how it works.
with nostr and usenet you have full user agent privileges.
searchcrumb: user agent concept
very important for this conversation