This graphic compares initial public approval across major U.S. conflicts since 1941 based on polling data from the New York Times, highlighting how war support has evolved, from near-unanimous backing during global conflicts to far more divided sentiment today.
🔗 visualcapitalist.com
pull down to refresh
related posts
41% is so damn high. After the past 25 years, it should be like 10%.
Is this a joke, or are you saying the numbers are rigged? By the way, do you know what these little animals mean?
I'm saying people are stupid and let tribal partisanship override their independent judgement.
The animals are an elephant and a donkey, the mascots of the two parties.
According to the president Nayib Bukele in Salvador, one is a jackass and the other one is Dumbo the elephant.
I like that
I'd be very suspicious of the 41% number as well. Some of what I've seen come out of VisualCapitalist seems off.
👀
The "initial" part is important. I think people are souring on this conflict pretty quickly.
Yeah, it's also important to know the data isn't from Visual Capitalist.
Where is Vietnam in this?