pull down to refresh

These results look scammy because one or more 'wrong guesses' were correct answers.

reply
3201 sats \ 9 replies \ @Scroogey 24 Mar

lol

reply
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @satseer 1 Apr

I tried to implement some of your suggestions and have 3 rounds queued now. Hopefully they are a little harder!

reply

deleted by author

I've got a new round up, and a couple others queued. Hopefully they are a little harder!

reply

I'm the creator. Thanks for directing me here to SN! I was wanting a place to directly interact with some of the players and get feedback!

reply

deleted by author

reply

A lot of your suggestions are good, and getting me thinking. I misunderstood you at first, thinking the answer would need to be complex. I've been trying not to use images found online though, which would mean I'd need to make/create these images.

reply

deleted by author

reply

deleted by author

Yes, lol. BTW, I refunded their guess.

reply

I agree about the rodents one, but disagree about the arcade one. You can play an arcade game on your phone, but the physical device here I would say is an "arcade cabinet" or "arcade machine." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcade_cabinet

reply

I'm the creator. Thanks for the feedback! I want this to be anything but "scammy"!

It's hard because I have to be somewhat subjective in how I set up the correct answers, but I do feel bad when I see some of these guesses come in!

I made this game based off of an old game that I used to play called ApopheniaBTC. It worked similar to how I have it set up. Sometimes if you knew you were close a strategy was to guess multiple times around your idea.

I put this in the About page: "Some images may accept more than one correct answer, but not every reasonable description will count. Waiting for the image to clear can help, but you risk losing the pot to someone else. Sometimes making multiple guesses (around a certain idea) could win you the pot!"

reply
101 sats \ 1 reply \ @ACYK 25 Mar

They should use a few of the sats and do an api call to ppq.ai or routstr and ask if the guess is equivalent enough to the correct answer, and if so, pay out, if no, mark it as wrong.

reply

I'm the creator. Never heard of this. Will look into it!

reply
90 sats \ 1 reply \ @satseer 20h

I hope you guys don't mind the ping! Just wanted to let you know that I just queued up 5 new 12-hour rounds at https://satseer.com

I started a new post, with some new info.

I've also added a new game mechanic - "Intense Focus"

I hope you guys think it is fun!

@1440000bytes @Scroogey @ACYK @k00b @stackt0shi @BlokchainB @02ad8239c2 @035736735e @LAXITIVA

reply

No luck for me!

reply
318 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 23 Mar

I love this. I'd like to see this structure applied to more things.

I also wonder if it can be applied to things where the system doesn't know the answer; an answer that's hard to generate but easy to verify. That probably only makes sense if participants can't fully verify it themselves though.

reply

I just realized that you created SN! I'm new here!

I was wondering if there is an API or something to post? I was trying to wire into my game a post creation at each new round, not only to notify others of the new round but also a place to discuss that specific round. Is this possible?

reply
5101 sats \ 1 reply \ @stackt0shi 24 Mar

Hey, I guessed 'rodent' and 'sitting mice' and the answer was just 'mice'. I think that should count.

reply

I'm the creator. Just got directed to SN. Just zapped you 5000. I agree "rodent" should have been included in correct answers! When I saw you guess that, I was hoping you would guess again because you were close!

I have this in the About page "Some images may accept more than one correct answer, but not every reasonable description will count. Waiting for the image to clear can help, but you risk losing the pot to someone else. Sometimes making multiple guesses (around a certain idea) could win you the pot!"

reply

Cool!

reply
1001 sats \ 0 replies \ @satseer 29 Mar

Thanks, I'm the creator. Just got directed to SN!

reply
234 sats \ 2 replies \ @ACYK 23 Mar

A blur slider on the past photos to show what they looked like as they came into focus would be a fun feature.

reply
101 sats \ 1 reply \ @satseer 30 Mar

Yes, I like this idea. I had plans to at least show blurry and then click to show clear.

reply

It would also be interesting to see at what blur level the right answer was guessed!

reply

looking at past rounds, the remote control image had a correct answer of remote controller, but claims it expired without a winner...?

reply

I'm the creator. Yes, that was very close. I felt bad seeing that guess come in.

I have this in the About page: "Some images may accept more than one correct answer, but not every reasonable description will count. Waiting for the image to clear can help, but you risk losing the pot to someone else. Sometimes making multiple guesses (around a certain idea) could win you the pot!"

reply
103 sats \ 1 reply \ @satseer 30 Mar

Hey Everyone! I'm the creator of satseer.com. @Scroogey just directed me here to SN. I'm glad to get your feedback, and thanks to those who have tried playing!

reply

deleted by author

It has the feel of a kind of dutch auction. You could almost tell a story this way: readers make predictions about what happens next.

reply

Get me a beer

reply

I thought this said beer hahaha

reply

Log Cabin

reply