I love this. I'd like to see this structure applied to more things.
I also wonder if it can be applied to things where the system doesn't know the answer; an answer that's hard to generate but easy to verify. That probably only makes sense if participants can't fully verify it themselves though.
A blur slider on the past photos to show what they looked like as they came into focus would be a fun feature.
These results look scammy because one or more 'wrong guesses' were correct answers.
lol
I love this. I'd like to see this structure applied to more things.
I also wonder if it can be applied to things where the system doesn't know the answer; an answer that's hard to generate but easy to verify. That probably only makes sense if participants can't fully verify it themselves though.
It has the feel of a kind of dutch auction. You could almost tell a story this way: readers make predictions about what happens next.
Hey, I guessed 'rodent' and 'sitting mice' and the answer was just 'mice'. I think that should count.
looking at past rounds, the remote control image had a correct answer of remote controller, but claims it expired without a winner...?
Log Cabin
Cool!