Does anyone have advice on handling situations where a close friend, partner or parent has a limited view of a news story because their sources aren’t very diverse? How can you present a different perspective in a way that doesn’t come across as a conspiracy theory or online rabbit hole, even if your information is well-researched? I know it probably depends on the relationship, but how can you stay calm and avoid creating a confrontational vibe?
If you have experience of this I would love to hear any thoughts.
Play the long game. Recognize that you can't reshape their worldview in one conversation.
Ask them how they know what they think they know. If their source is mainstream media, you can ask, "Do you trust that they reported accurately?" They'll probably say something like, "Well, I trust them more than the conspiracy theorists online." And you can say, "But that's not what I'm asking."
Try to find common ground. Most people can see the grain of truth in your views--if you're willing to see the grain of truth in theirs.
build a bridge first. Begin at the most basic place where you agree.
Offer understanding where you can for their personal view point ( be generous and make sure they will agree with your framing). Propose your viewpoint.
get him onto some nostr meme-streams;
nevent1qqswua4ad27u8h6avltj95978tl2ujfedwx4huazdcjhe9hmdvlsanspzemhxue69uhky6t5vdhkjmn9wgh8xmmrd9skcq3qn8p3c4692ewkya5ymnerzdutw7a4p9sx74gvl4mmexkglc4uymmqxpqqqqqqzkw8du3
Ha ha, good one
Everything’s a conspiracy though. Your is the conspiracy
Maybe you're right.
On (geo)political issues? Respect people even if you think they're wrong. Don't argue.
Yes, those issues. Respect isn't under threat here, it's that one person's reality can be so different to another's purely because of the information they consume. So when you know someone's inputs are limited I feel it is important to educate them on other reasonable (not deranged) perspectives. But even those perspectives are hard to hear when they describe a reality so different to what you have understood thus far.
Unless they ask you to, I wouldn't recommend to "educate" anyone really. Especially not on those issues. If they're open to learn, they'll ask you for your expert opinion. Realize though that unless your information is first-hand, you're probably not an expert.
You are right, educate was the wrong word there. It sounds too much like "I know best" which isn't the case here. Noted!
I think that if this stuff makes you in anyway emotional, it's probably better to avoid the subject. If of course it's not brought up by you, @SimpleStacker had a good point. Just relax and ask questions. And try to understand their pov. That alone is even more valuable than them agreeing with you.
the users don't know the meaning of the word: educate; i intepret education as "leading forth out of darkness," if u are on the righteous side of things;
😹😹😹
You can't.
Saw this today:
https://twiiit.com/LozzaFox/status/2033560430115754466
Input: "Handling limited news perspectives"
Processing through recursive manifold... got iteration?
Measure Of Effectiveness?
Obviously, handling limited news perspectives is handling limited news perspectives. Consequently, we're all sincere, ethical, honest; just functionals in a cosmic loop.
FOD-MOE pipeline complete.
Want another? 😄