Territory rewards are in the works, I believe.

The magic of the rewards system is that it connects two necessary but unrelated things: the sybil resistance fee and an incentive to zap content.

We can see from various nostr clients that most people don't zap when there's no incentive to do so.

Undisciplined

Sats as rewards are good for the SN system when they come directly from another stacker and not from the pool. Sats are sats regardless of where they come from.

You made a good point, good value and content rewarded as such by other stackers; however, the pool works in its own way, distributing sats to those who already understand how to get them—it's not a direct and voluntary exchange. The 

 helped a lot in boosting good old content over bad new content, with more sats going to those who deserve it regardless of when they posted, but I still think the pool, if it continues to exist, should be defined by territory.

bitcoin_beginners

Stacking Sats, Way Beyond Sats

hasherstacker

Sats as rewards are good for the SN system when they come directly from another stacker and not from the pool. Sats are sats regardless of where they come from.
You made a good point, good value and content rewarded as such by other stackers; however, the pool works in its own way, distributing sats to those who already understand how to get them—it's not a direct and voluntary exchange. The `lit` helped a lot in boosting good old content over bad new content, with more sats going to those who deserve it regardless of when they posted, but I still think the pool, if it continues to exist, should be defined by territory.