pull down to refresh
Fine, but that isn’t evidence that he was wrong.
It's also not evidence that he is right.
I disagree. It's not conclusive evidence, maybe not even strong evidence, but it is evidence.
I accept the rebuke on my use of "extremely" with respect to the privacy level. The only point that I wanted to make is that it's not what the author described, where every node can see exactly what everyone is doing.
Online people often use the word private when they are insinuating secret. Secret payments are a VERY high bar. There are trade-offs. I think this is why Satoshi didn't design bitcoin to be more focused on privacy.
Privacy is simply having limited exposure of something. Control if you will.
A secret is known by no one. Maybe you know it.
I don't know how many of you had parents that told you this but it apparently didn't get said enough. When you share a secret, it isn't a secret anymore.
This whole subtlety is why it is almost impossible to have a rational discussion about privacy with Monero people. I share many of their values and concerns but there are no solutions. Only trade-offs. Everything is trade-offs. I find people that can't acknowledge trade-offs insufferable.
The only reason people not attaching both send and receive wallets to SNs gave is for 'privacy'.
These are people who claim to be champipns of Bitcoin.
Oh the hyporisy yet @Undisciplined sides with them and continues to troll my efforts to raise the issue of virtue signalling BTC Maxi hypocrites who refuse to actually maximise and show their use of LN here on SNs.
@supertestnet demonstrated to no-node-having monero-holding retards that they couldn't determine anything about a lightning payment.
Maybe he should have challenged someone from ACINQ/River/LN-BIG.