pull down to refresh
I think my stance is that they shouldn't be making stupid promises.
Exactly!
I think it's poor business to refuse customers based on the money they want to use rather than just adding the cost of their shitty money to your prices for them
Agreed.
I think the whole bitcoin-only thing exclusively makes sense for security products. This means wallets and especially of the hardware type. If nvk breaks the bitcoin-only promise on the next coldcard iteration that could be a gigantic red flag. For Blixt or even Phoenix to go deal in shitcoins... yeah, that be bad too. But this is because the extra surface weakens end-user security.
Everything else is just to please the maxis. If you please someone and then do a 180... especially because the only reason to do it in the first place was to ride the maxi seal of approval... then there ought to be consequences. If no consequences then maxis are weak.
reply
fair. I've never promised anything. I make posters. I sell them.
It feels a little like this: I've had people pressure me to make numbered prints. I think numbered prints are a bit of a fraud in the first place. Sure, I could promise to not print more, but if someone offers the right price, I assume all the numbered print artists will print more. The artists who decide to print more are violating their promise. But I think my stance is that they shouldn't be making stupid promises.
Bitcoin-only merchants are similar. Sure, they can say they are bitcoin only, but it feels very strange that we have a culture that encourages people to make poor business choices. (Well, I think it's poor business to refuse customers based on the money they want to use rather than just adding the cost of their shitty money to your prices for them).