pull down to refresh
I know. This post gave me pause. It did generate so much discussion that I decided not to get in the way of my normal practice. I may have to rethink my rewards method. Maybe check each post for downzaps. I don't want to completely disincentivise controversial posts, so it's a tough call.
Instead of removing downzaps from the calculation you should remove boosts. That post's "investment" came almost entirely from boosts.
But to be honest, that's too much work unless SN implements a sort ranking that excludes boosts.
Yeah. If I continue the awards, I'm going to have to evaluate each post AFTER checking the zaprank.
What? I think there's some confusion here!
No confusion. If you set this in your SN settings, you will see posts by how many sats were "invested" in total. up or down doesn't matter.
What you consider a downzap, for others could be an upzap....
wrong! invested = cost + boost + stacked
And if I’m not mistaken, when it comes to TOP post/comment stuff, the downzaps get subtracted from the upzaps.
As I said... what you consider downzap for me maybe is upzap.
And from now on, I will change my SN standard: 1 sat downzap if I like a post.
There’s no debate about it. Downzaps subtract, upzaps add. It’s just math.
The SN zaprank is broken now. 1 upzap = 1 downzap