pull down to refresh
getting sats "directly" from others in posts?
That is real V4V.
If I zap you now 100 sats, 30% goes to SN rewards pool, rewarding user that I do not want initially to zap. That means theft. If the sats goes to SN pockets only, I am perfectly fine with that.
You must prove to me first, if you deserve my sats.
As I said, if you agree to receive subsidies from rewards pool, why don't you just forward all the sats you get from a post to 10-20-30 SN users?
When people will see to who you are redirecting the sats, will think twice if they will zap you or not.
Isn't that 30% there to keep posters from zapping themselves, as the anti-sybil?
???
So literally is going back to the same ones. There are many here knowing how to game the rewards system... and honestly, me included.
But I do not like how this system goes. I really feel bad knowing that I take sats from others thhat I do not deserve but also I feel bad subsiding others that I do not want to zap.
I am pointing out a flaw !
And ofc nobody wants to recognize the flaw because everybody is a scammer here... and want to take advantage of it as long as they could.
I thought from that 30% a small % went to SN itself.
If platforms like stacker don't receive some sats... How do they pay for upkeep? Hosting?
I am happy to see a small ℅ go to SN to pay for the site... So we have more sites like SN in the future. And a small ℅ for anti-sybil...
People zap for value, when there's no value they won't just my 2 sats. I don't expect it to be perfect but IMO its better than anything else
I raised this aspect from some time ago... dec 2024 #796213
I'm not sure.
I like stacker the way it is now. Not because of the 'assmilkers' but because it is so unique.
If I contribute posts thoughtfully in a way that people enjoy, why shouldnt I get a few sats back?
Just to be clear that's not why I post, I post because stacker news is awesome... But I think people who contribute to the platform meaningfully should see some kind of value returned.
What's the difference between that... And getting sats "directly" from others in posts?