pull down to refresh
How did I get my hands on those CCs?
Only you know unless you want to show your wallet history?
Here's mine and I am happy to show it- I have contributed significant volumes of real money (sats) into the SNs economy...because I wanted to support it and the V4V model it was seeking to apply.
https://m.stacker.news/132145
Assuming you do not wish to show your wallet history then we can probably assume you get most if not all your CCs by providing content thus receiving zaps and rewards.
Point is you demonstrably choose to minimize your use of sats and Bitcoin and the extent to which you do attach a LN wallet is only to receive sats, not to send them.
You structure your setup to maximise your extraction of sats but minimise your own use of sats and LN.
SNs does need content providers like you but it also needs content consumers who feed real money (sats) into the SNs economy - most of us will be both, to some extent, but your setup is designed to maximise your extraction of sats and minimize if not eliminate your use of them within the SNs ecosystem.
As a content consumer and Bitcoiner enthusiastic about the protocol, I am highly reluctant to zap sats to any content provider who identifies as a Bitcoiner but chooses to in reality minimise their use of sats and LN here.
And yet @denlillaapan you deliberately minimise your use of the LN here on SNs and only attach a receiving wallet (and even that you conceal) meaning any transactions you initiate here are mostly done without using LN, instead using CC inhouse tokens.
Why don't you walk the talk and attach a sending wallet and use LN/sats more?
The ideals and ethos of Bitcoin do have integrity but many claiming to admire them do not apply them in practice.