pull down to refresh

It doesn't need a 'minority of nodes' to agree to anything. It triggers sometime in august and the nodes running it start invalidating blocks from the "main chain" AKA actual bitcoin.

Then those nodes may be waiting a long time ie many years before they see a chain that meets their ruleset with more than a few blocks if they ever even get that far...

The 'new chain' with new rules needs 2000 blocks approximately to get a difficulty adjustment and at 1% of former hashrate thats... 200 weeks or about 4 years. All that time bip110 miners get ZERO new coins they can sell unless they have waited at least 100 blocks which means about 2 years... So bip110 miners don't get any revenue from mining for 2 years at 1% of current hashrate.

If bip110ers were serious they would be buying asics and a lot of them but it's easier to sit in the basement and LARP.

25 sats \ 8 replies \ @Taj 4h

Thank you 😊 thats a great explanation 👍 im just observing the debate

When you put it like that, the larping may soon be limping!

Money talks

So would you say, the spam argument is a surface level offering to the bip, whereas there may be an ulterior motives hidden in plain sight?

reply

My humble opinion is that people are just misled... There is no way to really stop 'spam' it is more or less an attack on the network that can take almost any format.

The only way to actually stop it is outbid it which is trivial to do at 1 sat/vbyte.

reply
4 sats \ 6 replies \ @Taj 3h

Yes, obviously i dont know all the terminology but there are many ways to skin a cat or should I say opcat lol

I'm with you in that if you pay the fee etc but as you say, with fees being so low there's a low barrier to entry

Would you say that bip110 is effectively choosing what you're 'allowed' to add to a block?, which to my mind is madness

Is it common for developers to develop main character syndrome and feel the need to save Bitcoin?

reply
125 sats \ 5 replies \ @028559d218 3h

The 'harm' to nodes comes from the bloating of the UTXO set not cheap access to blockspace.

However the set could be bloated by runes or op_return arbitrary metaprotocols adopted by degens... That are infinite in configuration and design. They come and go with bull and bear markets and can happen any time.

Bip110 would have more support if fees were really high for a really long time but at sub 1 sat fees, miners think it doesn't make sense/it keeps moving the goalposts.

If bitcoin were really adopted fees onchain would be very high and onchain transactions would be very expensive, maybe 30$ or more. Spam doesn't fix that nor do filters.

reply
4 sats \ 3 replies \ @Taj 3h

So with adoption, monetary txs outbid slop naturally, no need for filters or forks

Would you say this only feels like a "problem" in this low use period, higher fees would price out most slop automatically?

reply
125 sats \ 2 replies \ @028559d218 2h

In my opinion yes and that's what we see anyway. At 1 sat / vbyte about half the block is spam.

At 2 sat / vbyte maybe 10%

At 3 sat / vbyte maybe 1%

Real global adoption implies 20-30 sat / vbyte over a long time period meaning that spam would be possible but extremely expensive for spammers, only possible for short periods, miners would be well compensated and an enormous # of people would be bidding to get into blocks meaning that small/efficient transactions would out price larger less efficient ones.

I personally think this will still happen... But it will take time.

In other words... My humble opinion is that currently bip-110 adds risk with little/no meaningful upside and isn't helpful at this time.

reply
204 sats \ 1 reply \ @Taj 2h

Agreed 👍 thank you for your knowledge 🙏 Optimism will have his own take but I'm sure any common sense view would agree with us

The absence of a leader or ceo leaves us in an echo chamber of constant bickering over direction

But I'd hope Satoshi would be watching this and agree that every little amendment is thoroughly scrutinised

And with knowledgeable contributors like yourself and many others here, we can come to see Bitcoin March on block by block

I hope that noderunners see this view and I'm confident they will

reply
125 sats \ 0 replies \ @028559d218 2h

Optimism and others here vastly more knowledgeable than I am. However I report what I see... And what experience I have using the network.

Good luck

The other day I saw that ViaBTC isn't mining sub-1sat fee, nor large OP_RETURN. This could simply be a feature of simply not upgrading Bitcoin Core, I'm not sure if there's an intent behind it. example block

I think that that's a much clearer signal than supporting filters, even if it's unintentional as such.

reply