Have you thought about requiring an upfront payment for a PR to be considered? Which would be refunded when it's successfully merged?

Losing 50% for a requested change would probably turn me off from even trying, honestly. That’s a big hit. But I recognize the challenge here

I just paused them. As is, they are biased toward producing code and that's the easy part now.

Somehow, we need to gate/award folks based on specification, QA, and code review.

I suspect having:

1. a higher reward for detailed issues
2. a grave penalty, like 50% for a single requested change
3. banning future contributions when something is totally off base

might be enough

k00b

, so maybe they didn't take it away.  I vaguely recall 

 mentioning stopping it because of too many bots.  But my recollection may be faulty.

AskSN

How many of you are small business owners?

SimpleStacker

it's still on the `README.md`, so maybe they didn't take it away.  I vaguely recall @k00b mentioning stopping it because of too many bots.  But my recollection may be faulty.