The only ones not responding are the ones I ask questions that make them uncomfortable to answer.

Either they do not answer or respond with childish trolling that seeks to evade the question asked and divert attention to shooting me, the messenger.

I have always sought a reasoned dialogue as the first option and only resort to downzapping as a last resort.

Nobody has credibly argued how a content provider here who identifies as a Bitcoiner and frequently posts about Bitcoin cannot be a hypocrit where they do not attach LN wallets and show that they have so that content consumer can see the content provider is consistent and true to their stated beliefs.

Content consumers (like me) have every right to want content providers to demonstrate consistency between their words and actions.
Hypocrisy is not a good look and does not deserve V4V zaps.

I believe content consumers here (like me) who ultimately must fund the entire platform if it is to be viable have a right to know which content providers (especially those proclaiming to be Bitcoin advocates and enthusiasts) have made the effort to attach LN wallets and thereby maximise their use of and support for the LN.

Do you disagree?

I genuinely cannot understand why a Bitcoiner would not attach wallets and maximise the degree to which they use sats and support the LNs growth and liquidity instead of inferior CC shitcoins- unless they are a total hypocrit and maybe don't even realise it?