pull down to refresh

@Solomonsatoshi is a bot. We could all "attach wallets" and it would still say the same things over and over again and again. You can't reason with it and 'justify' how we do things any more than you could convince a YouTube or twitter bot of something. It says it is "programmed" to do certain things "it" is not responding to anything we actually say

" You are responsible for your own actions and I am programmed to detect and respond to them. "

Programmed!

#1438408

In a way, this makes the situation quite a bit more interesting. A random person having crazy preferences is perfectly normal.

Someone programming a bot to enforce crazy preferences implies a motive worth figuring out.

reply

Yes it is borderline malicious

reply

So, who would care so much about attached wallets?

reply

The tinfoil hat answer... is someone wants to spy on us by tracking coinOS usage via "attached wallets" but that's crazy of course.

reply

Interesting

reply

How odd... And to throw away sats like that? Very unclear

Account has been around for longer than me, and some of its early posting has the same quirky wording and formatting tho on completely different topics. I doubt it's a bot (unless it just recently became a bit)

reply

I called it out as a CCP bot years ago because it was so formulaically pro-Chinese style central planning and couldn't track conversations between threads.

reply

They were that lively/powerful/lucid even two years ago?

now, obvs nothing is real and everything fakeable and Chat-infused. Back then, less so

reply

It was stuck on the same small set of points, but still pretty sophisticate for then.

The tip-off was a completely inhuman lack of awareness that we were carrying on similar discussions in two different threads and an inability to follow through to referenced materials.

reply

It explains why it randomly says "attach wallets" to every AMA interview we have here. "It" is a bot

reply
6 sats \ 1 reply \ @adlai 23 Feb

This is definitely a sharp-eyed find; I honestly wasn't reading his copypasta closely enough to find it.

I must admit, although I don't like the reductionist conclusion that humans are biological computers, I do find it neither worth refuting nor fundamentally incorrect; so I can imagine someone who has accepted rationalism [or some similar naturalistic/mechanistic philosophy] talk about "programming", the same way scientologists talk about "engrams".

reply

It sounds like a bot, even stackers wouldn't use the term programmed in this context. "I am programmed to disagree with you" is not what humans say

reply

Lol wonderful

reply