You are posting highly technical LN content but you have not yourself bothered to attach a LN to your SNs account?
If you dont have an attached sending wallet and do not manually send a zap via LN then the SNs payment system will tend to send CCs, not sats, much more often because without a sending wallet SNs will automatically prioritise sending CCs.
If however you attach a sending wallet then your use of LN and sats will be maximised automatically and importantly all other SNs users and content consumers will have verification that you have set up to maximise your use of LN and sats.
With only a receiving wallet attached it is impossible for others to know if you are maximising your support of the LN or not . . . without you showing a gun they can reasonably assume you are most likely not.
Showing a sending wallet verifies to all others that you are maximising your use of sats and LN and so maximising your support of LN and SNs sats denominated V4V P2P ethos.
Oh, it’s just that I forgot to prepare by reading the questions I was sent beforehand that might come up. And even the few things I had prepared to say, I didn’t end up saying them.
I actually had suggestions for NWC, but when it was time to share them, I only said something like, “I can’t imagine anything better than NWC,” lol. That was basically a cowardly lie, because I felt so unprepared.
That’s all. In my mind, I could have done so much better, but thanks for saying it wasn’t embarrassing!
You @DarthCoin talk a lot about Bitcoin and LN but you cant be fucked to attach LN wallets here on SNs.
You claim to be a BTC Maxi 'living on the bitcoin standard' but at the same time say you prefer using CC shitcoins to sats here on SNs because 'CCs always work'.
If you dont have an attached sending wallet and do not manually send a zap via LN then the SNs payment system will tend to send CCs, not sats, much more often because without a sending wallet SNs will automatically prioritise sending CCs. If however you attach a sending wallet then your use of LN and sats will be maximised automatically and importantly all other SNs users and content consumers will have verification that you have set up to maximise your use of LN and sats. With only a receiving wallet attached it is impossible for others to know if you are maximising your support of the LN or not . . . without you showing a gun they can reasonably assume you are most likely not. Showing a sending wallet verifies to all others that you are maximising your use of sats and LN.
Speaking in public and being on camera isn’t for everyone. Either you’re naturally comfortable with it or you need some experience under your belt. No doubt about it, that’s definitely not my thing!
You are posting highly technical LN content but you have not yourself bothered to attach a LN to your SNs account?
If you dont have an attached sending wallet and do not manually send a zap via LN then the SNs payment system will tend to send CCs, not sats, much more often because without a sending wallet SNs will automatically prioritise sending CCs.
If however you attach a sending wallet then your use of LN and sats will be maximised automatically and importantly all other SNs users and content consumers will have verification that you have set up to maximise your use of LN and sats.
With only a receiving wallet attached it is impossible for others to know if you are maximising your support of the LN or not . . . without you showing a gun they can reasonably assume you are most likely not.
Showing a sending wallet verifies to all others that you are maximising your use of sats and LN and so maximising your support of LN and SNs sats denominated V4V P2P ethos.
@ek, right in the middle of the sharks! So sick. I’ll check it out properly later. Thanks @btcpp
I think my talk was pretty good, but from memory, I really embarrassed myself here
Oh well, it was my first panel, so whatevs ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I thought it was a great panel. Didn't see anything that you would think was embarrassing.
Oh, it’s just that I forgot to prepare by reading the questions I was sent beforehand that might come up. And even the few things I had prepared to say, I didn’t end up saying them.
I actually had suggestions for NWC, but when it was time to share them, I only said something like, “I can’t imagine anything better than NWC,” lol. That was basically a cowardly lie, because I felt so unprepared.
That’s all. In my mind, I could have done so much better, but thanks for saying it wasn’t embarrassing!
why "embarrassed" ?
People are watching this video more to listen what you have to say, and not as a "mister universe" contest.
You @DarthCoin talk a lot about Bitcoin and LN but you cant be fucked to attach LN wallets here on SNs.
You claim to be a BTC Maxi 'living on the bitcoin standard' but at the same time say you prefer using CC shitcoins to sats here on SNs because 'CCs always work'.
Some may call @DarthCoin a HYPOCRIT!
If you dont have an attached sending wallet and do not manually send a zap via LN then the SNs payment system will tend to send CCs, not sats, much more often because without a sending wallet SNs will automatically prioritise sending CCs.
If however you attach a sending wallet then your use of LN and sats will be maximised automatically and importantly all other SNs users and content consumers will have verification that you have set up to maximise your use of LN and sats.
With only a receiving wallet attached it is impossible for others to know if you are maximising your support of the LN or not . . . without you showing a gun they can reasonably assume you are most likely not.
Showing a sending wallet verifies to all others that you are maximising your use of sats and LN.
Speaking in public and being on camera isn’t for everyone. Either you’re naturally comfortable with it or you need some experience under your belt. No doubt about it, that’s definitely not my thing!