pull down to refresh

27 sats \ 4 replies \ @adlai 5h

the log-log[1] "Posts vs Sats Stacked" [2nd row, left side] shows it beautifully

  1. linked in case people like wikipedia; tl;dr, switching both scales of a graph from linear to logarithmic causes some kinds of data behavior to "jump out" because the log scales turn certain kinds of curves into lines of recognizeable angles

reply

I'm being facetious, cuz all the power-law log-log stuff is complete bullshit (#1433264).

Nice to find a Pareto distr in the SN wilderness

reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @adlai 5h

honestly I'm not well-versed in the detailed differences.

the line on the log-log chart, with meta outlying, is undeniable.

I'm being facetious, cuz all the power-law log-log stuff is complete[1] bullshit (#1433264).

I agree that quibbling over whether some fitted curve is n^x, x^n, or something else, is futile in most situations... although a conversation in one situation could be complete bullshit, without reducing the abstract accuracy of the mathematics.

  1. emphasis mine, on the word that pissed me off ...

reply

I thought Pareto distributions show up everywhere

reply

Yahyah, a little bit

reply