in my opinion, a thorough parasite cleanse takes at least 90 days, which is just over 3 lunar cycles; parasites prefer to hatch during full moons;
i reason that during the first 30 days one eliminates the fat juicy adult worms; during the next 30 days one is battling the rescue-hatch batch hastily laid by the original adults, and the last 30 days are for killing off anything that manages to live on but does not have the wisdom of grandparent worms (presumably wiped out in the first 30 days) of navigating & managing & and hiding within the living flesh/bone/blood;
Paul Chek, for example, recommends at least 60 days of cleansing; i doubt he is parasite-free; #1 evidence of his being persistently infested (see: Standard Parasitic Criteria) is that he still has the urge to speak; his main objective in teaching people to cleanse is to maintain a business empire; in a way, the battle against parasites can be a profitable business model, a gift that keeps giving; it's an extremely difficult problem to eradicate!
my mission is to wipe them all out, which wud, in theory, remove the urge to speak out loud, and allow the use of tongue sparingly as a tool of strategic communication wen other modalities are insufficient; one has to be flexible, as in the battle against cancer!
listen closely to how this "terminal stage cancer patient" and the interviewer describe the problem, anthropomorphizing it:
so far i can only imagine monks in temples far away in the forest/mountains to be disciplined enuff to remain in total silence; the greatest risk to them are the heavily infested tourists - that is why i think that most "vows of silence" are for show only, and the parasite-in-monks evolves a different strategy for spore/egg transmission - such as thru library books (fomites) and domesticated animals such as cats & tigers;
caption: which type of monk wud u rather be?
true resilience from parasitic influence has to be maintained thru continuous endurance training, such as thru strengthening the native electromagnetic aura; the parasite shud die shortly after entering the body, unable to penetrate the defensive barriers;
Not sure why you forwarded some of those zaps to me, but I appreciate it 🙏🤠
https://www.occult.live/index.php/The_Hierophant
(ignore "History" and "Divinatory meaning" sections, all bullshit; tarot cards are memes)
Ivermectin kills parasites
there are no magic pills (or injectables) with 100% results, multiple sustainable strategies & clever tactics are required on the journey to higher purity; the parasite can adapt and grow resilient, thru upregulating the host's endogenous cytochrome p450 (metabolises drugs) for example or potentially by mutating or hiding behind thicker biofilms;
in addition, as the parasite hivemind matures and takes over more supply chains, previously effective compounds will either stop being available or become contaminated or something else... the simplest & cheapest method is prolonged fasting;
Not all of them.
It didn't kill Trump.
btc community is host to a lot of mind-viruses these days.
I think we found another.
What is Stacker News?
It is a social media platform intentionally created to enable a P2P V4V BTC denominated community.
Originally Stacker News (SN) custodyed sats on behalf of participants but the threat of government regulatory prosecution on the pretext of money transmitter forced a move away from the custody of sats by the platform to the platform enabling participants to send sats via their wallets.
To achieve this participants need to attach wallets to both send and receive sats.
Where participants do not or cannot attach LN wallets transactions will often default to Cowboy Credits.
This change was a compromise forced by the threat of government prosecution.
The difficulty of attaching both sending and receiving wallets is moderate- it takes some effort and newbie or non tech people may struggle with it, but most competent Bitcoiners can succeed in attaching wallets and thus enabling sats denominated P2P transactions.
But a number of Stackers have chosen not to attach wallets- in particular sending wallets which enable you to send sats into the SN community.
Very few have attached just a sending wallet- many have attach just a receiving wallet.
Those who only attach a receiving wallet can receive sats from others but cannot send sats into the community. They may feel that as content providers they have no need or obligation to send sats into and within the SN community. I disagree.
Where these receive but not send (horse but no gun) Stackers proclaim to be Bitcoiners but refuse to enable a sending wallet they are demonstrably hypocrits. They claim they want to build and grow the BTC LN MoE network but they cannot be bothered contributing toward that growth by attaching a sending wallet and demonstrating they are not just talking, but are also walking and supporting a sats denominated platform.
If we do not use the LN wherever and whenever we can it will not grow and develop.
Some claim it is too hard to attach wallets- its too hard on their self custody nodes or wallets- this just highlights how much work the LN still needs before it is capable of anything approaching 100% reliable MoE capability.
But the best way to grow and strengthen the LN is it use it – despite its remaining flaws and glitches.
When wallets are supported by people using them they receives transaction fees and can develop liquidity and systems further.
When LN wallets are not used the LN decays- it does not have the usage and fees income to grow.
So when self proclaimed advocates for BTC and LN refuse to attach wallets (especially sending wallets) I see hypocrit.
I will continue to see hypocrit until and unless someone can explain why I should not.
Calling me a Nazi, trolling and making fun of me crudely seeking to avoid the issues I raise will not stop me from asking why are you claiming to be a Bitcoiner but refusing to attach wallets and use the LN here where we can help it grow.
Now some are deliberately concealing their wallet status, as if this is about a right to privacy.
Concealing your wallet status means nobody else can verify whether or not you are serious about using BTC LN, or whether you are just an all talk no walk hypocrit.
Do not trust- verify.
What about this fundamental principle do they not understand?
And then they talk about 'content' being more important than whether or not you have attached wallets - in this context the intentional lack of attached wallets undermines your credibility as your actions do not match your words.
Your submitted content may be great, but you as someone claiming to be a serious Bitcoiner are undermining your credibility and the credibility of your content by being a hypocrit.
Your content, is tainted by your verifiable hypocrisy.
SNs needs both good content providers and those who pay for that content if it is succeed.
I am more in the latter group than the former but both are required overall or the model does not work.
So as a net contributor of sats and thus a net consumer of content I object where content providers refuse to engage in the P2P V4V ethos by refusing to attach both sending and receiving wallets and I will both withhold my contribution of sats and sometimes downvote in response.
V4V needs to work reciprocally or it will not work at all.
Have you attached a sending wallet- or are you an arsemilking parasite who cant be bothered making the effort required to attach LN wallets or has but is hiding them?
The only proof content consumers have is if you show a gun and horse next to your nym...and the OP does not.
The content providers need net sats contributors/content consumers who send sats into the platform, or the entire platform fails.