That is not a reasoned argument.
Learn how to make one - and stop looking and acting like a troll.

You have made these bullshit diversionary claims before.

Now you repeat it again rather than responding to my many already provided reply.

CCs are not Sats
CCs do not use the LN.
CCs are not P2P.
CCs are not decentralised.
CCs are not limited issuance.
CCs transactions do not support the LN.
CCs are shitcoins.

So it matters nothing whether I use custodial or non custodial wallet- the fact is I am zapping, posting and commenting using sats P2P.

You are not.
You are using CC shitcoins via centralised custodial shitcoin system.

Everytime I zap, post or comment I pay fees and use the LN and support the LN.

You dont.

You wank on about 'living on the bitcoin standard' but here in the only context where such claims might be evidenced, you refuse to use sats.

The horse and the gun are PoW that the holder of these symbols has made the effort required to transact P2P V4V using the LN and using sats.

You have no such PoW- you are a fraud, a troll and a hypocrit.