Courts are now saying it out loud: the presumption of regularity may not apply.

“In just six months, the President… may have forfeited the right… [to] presumption of regularity.”

— Paul L. Friedman — Federal Education Association v. Trump

So in this situation, transparency is reduced, not increased.

What evidence would restore that presumption for you?

news

Politics_And_Law

U.S. Issues NOTAM Over El Paso for 10 Days Over 'security reasons'

Cje95

Courts are now saying it out loud: the presumption of regularity may not apply.

>**“In just six months, the President… may have forfeited the right… [to] presumption of regularity.”**

— Paul L. Friedman — Federal Education Association v. Trump

So in this situation, transparency is reduced, not increased.

What evidence would restore that presumption for you?