pull down to refresh

FUD. "It is a bug to use op_if for that. You have more than 2 weeks. Start fixing it today." https://x.com/i/status/2021610190466920834

if you look at my OP, I included that post from Luke.

You may feel that soft forks that break user space should be taken lightly, but it seems to me that if we want bitcoin to be a useful money for any large group of transactors, we are going such actions are not going to help.

reply

You seem not to know what user space is. The term is not applicable to Bitcoin.

Bitcoin with the BIP-110 security update is fine. Miniscript is minishit and its sellers should not blame others for defects in it.

reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 2h
The term is not applicable to Bitcoin.

Doesn't that make the orditards a feature, not a bug?

reply

do you interact with bitcoin by typing your transactions out in json?

reply

Sometimes. It is not what mInIsCrIpT is about, though.

reply

I ask because I don't think most people who use bitcoin interact with it that way. they use some kind of wallet software. most people do not care what scrip their wallet is using. whether it is miniscript based or raw bitcoin script based is immaterial. users just want their wallet to produce addresses at which they can receive coins. soft forks that require users to update or less the software will produce invalid scripts is something we should be very careful about.

reply